However, the term Orchestration has become massively overused and ambiguous, it reminds me of the confused conversation we have around what everyone means about “Policy” and “Service”. We now spend the first 20 mins of every customer or partner meeting discussing what everyone in the room means when they say orchestration.
Every vendor in the NFV supply chain has an orchestration offering. VNF vendors have orchestrators to manage their network software. Virtual test vendors have orchestrators to run their test/probes. “Service” Orchestrators are required to sit across vendor specific orchestrators and to span multiple data centres.
The automation of virtual network and service lifecycle tasks from initial onboarding of VNF software to continuous service management maps exactly to the objectives and tools from the Enterprise IT DevOps movement. DevOps promotes the chaining of tools that automate Development and Operational lifecycle tasks into a single self-optimising feedback loop. The NFV industry needs to organise its various orchestrators as tools that can be chained together to automate a complete set of VNF-to-Service operational lifecycle tasks. Rather than discussing Orchestration in general terms.
All orchestrators need to play their individual role in a broader “DevOps” toolchain to realise the benefits of NFV.

